Skip to main content

Dispatcher vs Conductor

Conductor and Dispatcher share the same core idea: give each coding agent its own git worktree and review the result before it merges. Conductor focuses on Claude Code and Codex on the Mac. Dispatcher supports a wider set of agent CLIs, runs on macOS and Windows, and adds the work around the agent: intake from Slack, GitHub, and Linear, a task board, a team knowledge base, and stacked pull requests.

Last reviewed October 14, 2026 from Conductor's public site and docs.

At a glance

Choose Dispatcher if

  • Your team uses agents beyond Claude Code and Codex, such as Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode, or Antigravity
  • Some of your engineers are on Windows
  • Requests arrive in Slack and you want them to become tasks automatically
  • You want large changes shipped as GitHub Stacks of dependent PRs

Choose Conductor if

  • Everyone is on Apple Silicon Macs and only uses Claude Code and Codex
  • You want the most focused, minimal parallel-agent app with nothing else around it

Feature comparison

“Not listed” means Conductor's public material does not mention it, not that it is missing.

FeatureDispatcherConductor
Runs several agents in parallelYesYes
Isolation modelGit worktree and branch per taskGit worktree per workspace
Supported agents12 agent CLIs, including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode, Antigravity, and GrokClaude Code and Codex
PlatformsmacOS and Windows (Linux planned)macOS (Apple Silicon)
Issue intakeYes: GitHub, Linear, SlackPartly: Linear issues, GitHub PRs
Slack mention to taskYesNot listed
Diff review before PRYes: Diff next to the agent's terminalYes
Stacked PRs (GitHub Stacks)Yes: Built-in gh stack flowNot listed
Task board and planningYes: Projects, cycles, roadmaps, review queueNot listed
Team docs synced to agentsYes: Synced into .dispatcher/contextNot listed
MCP and skills per agentYes: Harnesses screenNot listed
Source codeClosed sourceClosed source
PriceFree for local use; paid plans for cloud sync and teamsFree app; bring your own Claude or Codex access

Key differences

Which agents you can run

Conductor is built around Claude Code and Codex. Dispatcher runs any of twelve agent CLIs in the same way, so switching agents per task is a dropdown, not a different tool.

Where the work comes from

Conductor can start workspaces from Linear issues. Dispatcher also turns @dispatcher mentions in Slack into tasks, imports GitHub issues, and keeps everything on a shared board with cycles and a review queue.

How big changes ship

Both open pull requests from a reviewed workspace. Dispatcher can also split a large change into a GitHub Stack of dependent PRs, with the official gh-stack skill given to the agent automatically.

Questions

Is Dispatcher a Conductor alternative?
Yes. Both run coding agents in parallel git worktrees and put a diff review before the pull request. Dispatcher adds more agent CLIs, Windows support, Slack and GitHub intake, a task board, a knowledge base, and stacked PRs.
Does Dispatcher run on Windows?
Yes. Dispatcher ships for macOS (Apple Silicon and Intel) and Windows. Conductor is a Mac app.
Can I use my existing Claude Code or Codex subscription?
Yes, in both. Dispatcher runs the agent CLIs you already installed, signed in with your own accounts.

More comparisons

Conductor is a trademark of Melty Labs. This page compares publicly available information as of October 14, 2026; products change quickly, so check Conductor's site for current details. Spotted something out of date? Email support@getdispatcher.dev.

Try Dispatcher on your next task.

Free for local use on macOS and Windows. Bring the agents you already use.

Dispatcher vs Conductor (2026): parallel coding agents compared